Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Zack,
<snip> > > The main point of IntelliSense [1] is not about the actual completion > which type the word after you started typing it, is more about where to > find the possible completions and, in particular to find them via some > kind of representation of a codebase (e.g. the list of all methods > belonging to the class of the instance named to the left of a '.'). > > So, I ask you: either this is what "predictive" does for Emacs, maybe in > some programmable way (and would be like Vim's omnicompletion feature) > or it "just" complete in a single way using the word in the current > buffer (as plain Vim's autocompletion) and then it would be better do > describe it as "autocompletion". > Thank you for your comments about the predictive package. I already removed the comparison to Intellisense to avoid confusion as well as emailed the author regarding the matter. I also added "autocompletion" in the package description. Thank you for your suggestions. Have a nice day. Cheers, jan -- A meeting is an event at which the minutes are kept and the hours are lost. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
