On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:38 +0200, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: >> Hi On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:23:28 +0200 >> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If you encrypt to yourself, how is the voting system supposed to >>> decrypt it? >> It was encrypted for two keys, both of them can decrypt it. > It turns out that it was indeed encrypted, but the message > was > not signed; which means there is no information about who is > sending the ballot. This is a legitimate addition to the ballot; > I'll point it out in the next CFV. Hmm. Turns out, that ballot already mentioned that "you may, if you wish, choose to send a signed, encrypted ballot". The operative word is "signed", which the ballot in question was not. manoj -- No matter how good she looks, some other guy is sick and tired of putting up with her shit. Men's Room, Linda's Bar and Grill. Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C