On Apr 09, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files > in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian): It's OK, I planned to discuss this after the release. Experience showed that generally other packages do not need an easy way to disable their whole rules files, so I think we can conclude that usage of symlinks can be restricted to some of udev's own files and eventually packages with special needs. Do we need special code to move the conffiles on upgrades (and only do that if the symlink does not exist)?
At the same time it would be a good idea to change the XXX_ file name scheme to a saner one, since currently they all share 0??_ or z??_ prefixes to coexsist with the existing prefix-less files. Probably we should just copy the scheme used by Ubuntu, but I am not sure if there is a good way to do it. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
