On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:01:40PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > I wonder how many packages are triggering that right now. > > So is this valid utf-8? I don't believe so. If it is I have to go > reread the UTF-8 spec again. :) > > 4b c4 99 73 74 75 74 69 73 (K..stutis) > (I found this one in base-config from sarge since I happened to have > that one open in a hex editor for checking).
Darn. I was reading utf-8 wrong, and it turns out some utf shows correctly in konsole, but most don't. I wonder if I have to change fonts instead. They seem OK in gvim, so that probably means they are all perfectly fine. The only broken thing is me. :) Oh well, back to learning more about unicode for me it seems. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]