Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not like it would be difficult to decide on a standard to allow the > segment of text in README.Debian that described the optional > dependencies (or other information that a packagea maintainer thought > people may be interested in knowing as they're deciding what else to > install besides the package.)
Bleh. This is how we got the Homepage hack in the package descriptions. Please don't add structure to unstructured data retroactively; it makes parsing a mess. We already have a clean, structured file in which to store this sort of information, or we can introduce a new structured file. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]