On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:26:38PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:10:06PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > [...] > > Those are good reasons. Those are different reasons than "static > > libraries are faster", which was the previous argument for keeping them. > > No, that was "one" argument for keeping them, and the only one that I > could come up with in a short time frame about a subject that I don't > care much about. > > Since you forced me to think more about it, I came up with two more > reasons in an equally short timeframe. > > Of course, that begs the question why I seem to be the only one giving > reasons that seem quite obvious to me, but then again...
It only needs one person to voice them, but thank you for doing so. Regards, Paddy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]