Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 09:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > Yes, and that's the problem: I know the libgl shlibs to have been wrong in > > certain corner cases involving uncommon symbols (whether those are > > implementors adding their own extensions, or failing to implement the > > standard, or just exposing symbols in the lib that aren't part of the API in > > the headers, I don't know). > > And how would the new system help ?
You could make "standard" symbols lead to dependencies on either libgl package, while specific symbols would bring a dependency on the specific package providing them. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.