Ter, 2007-06-12 às 23:32 +0200, Vince H&K escreveu: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> NO! > >> > >> unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release, > >> as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to > >> migrate > >> to testing should be uploaded to unstable. > > > > Then shouldn't we have a more aggressive policy about removals from > > unstable, for packages that have failed to get into testing during the > > past n months ? > > Actually, I support that. What about a push from unstable to > experimental when a package fails to behave ? (given reasonable amount > of time and notice, of course). > Also providing apt with an option like apt-get install --reinstall {oldstable, stable, testing, unstable} would be nice.
experimenting packages from experimental would be easy, and reverting those test would be also. > This way, I tend to believe more people would have their eyes on > experimental, and that might solve some of the problems adressed in this > thread. > > Regards, > > Vincent > > -- > Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer > http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/ > -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ? > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]