On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:07:55AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > The problem with this theory (basically, that glibc is taking a > performance penalty by giving memory back to the system and hence being > more space efficient) is that not only is Hoard significantly faster than > glibc for OpenLDAP, it's also more space-efficient and allocates less > total memory as soon as there are multiple clients querying the server at > the same time.
I guess it depends on your access patterns. In any case, I do not oppose this ITP, but I think it should be noted that it doesn't give memory back to the operating system if that is indeed the case. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
