On Tue, Jun 26, 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > I think it would also be useful to include 'nostrip' and 'noopt' in the > Build-Options field, as a way to indicate that the package implements > those DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. I also have some Evil Plans for other things > that can go in Build-Options, but they're not ready yet and would be OT > in this thread.
Why not promote these to requirements in a particular policy version instead? I fear we will have to list 10 Build-Options in all packages in a couple of years. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
