On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:31:13PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Steve Langasek [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:25:11 -0700]:
> > But at a minimum, yes, the audacious-plugins package should be depending on > > libaudacious by way of shlibdeps. > There is no NEEDED entry in the plugins against libaudaciousX. That's a bug in the plugins, isn't it? Don't they refer to symbols from libaudacious? > Do you mean hardcoding the dependency instead? (Which, true, solves the > situation.) Nope. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]