Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Couldn't any inet-superserver package that provides its own >> update-inetd also Provide: update-inetd? Wouldn't that fix the >> problem? It has to Conflict with update-inetd anyway. > FWIW, presently the only inet-superserver package that doesn't depend on > update-inetd is rlinetd, and it diverts /usr/sbin/update-inetd rather > than conflicting. That seems wrong to me, too, although it probably predates the update-inetd package. I'm at a bit of a loss now as to whether to change lintian's checks or not, although I did update the long description of that tag to not push depending on update-inetd directly. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
