On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:47:59PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:59:13PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Pierre Habouzit dixit: > > > > >I don't see a valid reason for the > > >user to chose what lies behind /bin/sh. > > > > Debian policy allows it. > > Okay, but that's not an argument. What would be the point for the user > to change /bin/sh if Debian has already chosen the fastest and smallest > one ?
It being the smallest and fastest one doesn't really help if you're in a tight environment where you want only one shell to be installed, and you want to use a different one from whatever Debian chose because of other reasons. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]