Hello, On 8/8/07, David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I don't want to be a nuisance, but this has been puzzling me for > a few days now - I can't figure out how the license of a binary package > compiled from a source package could not be derived by combining the > licenses of the relevant source files?
I'm not an expert at all, so I might be wrong. I guess this would be the case if your source package compiled a statically linked binary against a library belonging to another source package. The licence of the binary package would then be a combination of the licences of boths the source files and the library. Again, this is a wild guess, so can anyone confirm? Cheers, François