On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > 2/ Second example, libconfig0 has a supplementary symbols [...] > _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ on sparc and alpha. I don't know where it comes > from. > Is this a internal symbols that I missed?
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2004-05/msg00577.html seems to suggest that only sparc and alpha want the PLT as a symbol. > On powerpc it has _SDA_BASE_ and _SDA2_BASE_. Same question as above. The Small Data Areas (SDA) seems to be ppc specific, and is mentioned in the elfspec_ppc.pdf. It's about data that can be access with 16 bit offset. > On amd64 it has lost the "_DYNAMIC" symbol. Same question as above. It seems this can be hidden: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00190.html amd64 built this package only in 2006, the rest did in 2003. I'm guessing building this again will remove it on other arches. > Quick googling led me to believe that I can/should exclude all those. If > someone can confirm, it would be great. I agree. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]