> I guess the Social Contract really is a joke. I don't know why new applicants > are supposed to agree to it. Old members apparently violate it at will for > years > with no consequences. > > It doesn't make me respect Debian very much.
I am not a DD (yet), but all my packages were very strictly checked for all non-free stuff that I forgot to delete and the Social Contract is not a joke at all. This is why I am using Debian. > Developers you have, are better than developers you don't have. The > ones you have, make Debian what it is. If reality doesn't match the > theory, change the theory, not the reality. I disagree - this is one of the reasons I am using Debian, because it strictly distinguishes between main and non-free. If there are some non-free parts in the kernel, it can go to non-free immediatelly, so that users can use it now, but things in main should be DFSG free and that's how it should be. As I see it, the non-free section is here precisely for those cases, that intuition says the packages should be in Debian, nevertheless, they are not DFSG free. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
