On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:28:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, John Kelly wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC), Sune Vuorela > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On 2007-09-12, John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> "Distribution of this memo is unlimited." > > >> > > >> With RFCs available to anyone with a web browser, it's absurd to say > > >> they're non-free, and a waste of time removing them from Debian. > > > > > >eh? whattabout modification? and distribution of modified versions? > > > > This is where it gets absurd. > > > > They're RFCs. They're not code. > > > > If you want to "modify" an RFC, you have to write your own and submit > > it, see? > > Which we have always allowed in software, even. It falls under the "publish > it with another name". >
the requirement to publish in a specific manner is an additional restriction. Granted there are software licenses like that, but are they DFSG free ? Regards, Paddy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
