On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:02:34 +0200, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>You mean the foo at bar dot com value isnt parseable? I dont think it
>has any value to encode an address like this, as any little spambot can
>EASILY decode that.
Agreed.
>Same goes for those idiots with
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" addresses.
Using a plus sign in the mail address is a _very_ _very_ effective
spam filter.
|$ grep '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' /var/log/exim4/mainlog-20070920 | wc -l
|70
|$ grep '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' /var/log/exim4/mainlog-20070920 | wc -l
|77
|$ grep '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' /var/log/exim4/mainlog-20070920 | wc -l
|44
|$ grep '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' /var/log/exim4/mainlog-20070920 | wc -l
|81
|$
The number of messages _with_ mh+ prefix includes legitimate mail; the
messages to addresses with mh+ stripped off are all spam, rejectable
at SMTP RCPT time ("no such user").
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
