On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On the other hand, maybe I should just be less picky for shared objects > > without SONAME... I'm not sure about it. > > > > I would suggest that, there are a few programs out there which use > many internal use shlibs without a soname and a more complex > tree of dirs to pick up their stuff than a single directory.
Also all Java JNI libraries dont use SONAMEs. I guess these can be problematic for new dpkg-shlibdeps too. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
