On Tue, 02 Oct 2007, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > Is it possible to compare this data against unofficial > > > kfreebsd-(i386|amd64) > > > and armel ports in http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/ [1] ? Armel port is > > > softfloat, and thus libraries using floats can end up exporting > > > inlined softfloat math functions. > > > Honestly, I have spent too much time on this project already and I'd > > rather have some help instead of giving me more work... > > Fair enough. Do you have a todo-list where to pick up tasks from?
Not really, on the code and dpkg side, everything is done except merging in the master branch (which is for RSN, this evening if all goes well). The new dpkg contains updated documentation for dpkg-shlibdeps and dpkg-gensymbols, but we'll need some generic documentation with best practices and explanations on how to handle the various cases. I suggest we start with a wiki page for this. Summarizing what has already been said here would be a good start. http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles But I was merely suggesting you to run dpkg-gensymbols on a few kfreebsd-*, armel packages and compare to the symbols files that I already generated to check if the exported symbol sets are the same and if not to explain the difference. Maybe there are some public symbols that are created/used by the toolchain and which are of no interest for symbols files (in which I shall blacklist them on my side). (Or maybe there are bugs in the respective toolchains) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]