On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 11:51:12 +0200, Philipp Marek wrote: > I'd assume it's not so much the binary size of the packages, but the > number of them ... that's why I asked whether a new branch might be > better for them. Like "stable", "testing", "unstable", "experimental" > ... "dbginfo". Then normal users wouldn't even see this packages. > It *is* the binary size of the packages. You don't want every -dbg package on the mirror network.
See e.g. Package: libgl1-mesa-dri Installed-Size: 35840 vs. Package: libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg Installed-Size: 183696 or Package: xserver-xorg-core Installed-Size: 10848 vs. Package: xserver-xorg-core-dbg Installed-Size: 33128 Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]