On 2007-10-12, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] full ack to whatever you wrote here - and thank you for your nice work with this.
> It's important to decide on reasonable delays. > - If the procedure takes too long, it will be discouraging I think that your proposed "times" falls slightly into this category. > - If the procedure is too short, decisions will be contested > I think that the following makes sense: > - For packages where orphaning was proposed: 50 days 1 month At least in cases where there is interested people in taking over, I think we need to be able to move "faster" than 50 days. > - For packages where removal was proposed: 100 days 2 month (But this one is not that important) > So, what do you think about that? Any proposed changes? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]