Hi, On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:55 +0100, Vadim Zeitlin wrote: > And, seeing from your signature that you're both a Debian and Ubuntu > developer, I'd like to notice that Ubuntu doesn't seem to find > anything > catastrophic with shipping wx2.8 which it does since quite some time.
So Ubuntu ships wx2.8. It doesn't matter to us. The fact that Ubuntu does ______________ is not generally considered a valid argument for justifying that Debian does the same. Additionally, not all Ubuntu contributors agree with all decisions made in the Ubuntu development process. What you should be telling us is why we _should_ be shipping wx2.8 over wx2.6 which is considered by many to be more proven than wx2.8. I am sure if you can come up with valid reasons to do so (especially identifying critical apps which require wx2.8 features is useful here), that we will be happy to provide wx2.8. William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
