Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:10:20 -0500 Philippe Cloutier wrote: > >>> That probably won't make much time difference on "fast" archs (i386, >>> amd64 etc), but on slower ones like mips, mipsel etc (those sometimes >>> hold up testing transition :(). >> A missing build will only slow testing migration if the package wasn't >> built when the unstable testing delay is over. Since almost all uploads >> to NEW are low urgency, the build would need to take over 10 days to >> affect the time to testing migration. > > pokerth 0.6-1-2 needed 13 days (uploaded on 28.01, built [but not yet > uploaded] today), so it *can* make a difference (not a really big one > though in this case)
paje.app 1.97+cvs20080110-2 did not built on mipsel for 26 days: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/paje.app.html http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=paje.app&ver=1.97%2Bcvs20080110-2 I wrote a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I put them in CC of this mail again) asking to trigger a build on 5 feb. I got no answer (can someone confirm that I'm using the good address email) ? I really hope this package will be build soon: paje.app was removed from testing a few time ago due to old FTBFS bugs. I would like this version to be in testing some times before the lenny freeze (new upstream version with new GNUStep libraries) Currently, paje.app in unstable 1.97+cvs20080110-2 has no bugs for 26 days but mipsel build is missing and preventing testing migration... Best regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]