Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:37:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have other ways of tracking that information than the version, though. > > Yes, and I don't really care, I just think going from +s1+nmu1 to +s2 > seems to be doing things that it doesn't (revert the NMU). Strange reasoning as 1.0-0.1 followed by 1.1 is also not reverting an NMU perse... >>> So we should go for +deb31[+]_1 or something? To make it clear again: >>> >>> +deb is a fixed part which means this is a security upload >> Or any other stable upload, yes? > > Yes, sorry. I forgot that those exist as well. :-) Why are we bothering to make something up if everyone is using etch<nr> etc? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
