On Tue, April 1, 2008 13:42, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On the more general issue of lzma-compresses packages, I find a 34MB > RAM requirement quite hefty for general purpose use; that is, unless > we restrict lzma compression to packages that wouldn't make sense on > hardware with so little RAM anyway (such as e.g. OpenOffice.org, but > nothing in base, nothing one would install on a pure router / lightweight > server such as iptables, kernels, FTP/HTTP daemons, ...).
When multiple compression types start to get supported, it would be a good idea if the epic Someone would write a bit for the developer's reference with some guidelines on which compression types would be suitable to which types of packages. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
