On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:37:57PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: > gnupg is important package. PTS says: > "The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some > co-maintainers."
> Suggestion: Can we replace 'should' with 'must'? Wrong problem - we don't need more maintainers for packages, we need responsive maintainers who stay on top of things. Chances are that anything you can enforce automatically probably isn't going to deal with that problem. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
