On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:22:24AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > In contrast, the alternative strategy of having all the libfoo-dev > (1.34.1) packages conflict with libfoo1.35.0-dev packages has just a > single negative: that you can't develop simultaneously with 1.34.1 and > 1.35.0. On the positive side, however, you can install the 1.35 -devs > and the existing build scripts will work because the include path and > the simplified link library names are preserved. > > So unless anyone (Domenico?) has a strong preference for the > first option, I'm planning to pursue the second.
second option, absolutely. we (I) do not want boost to proliferate in the archive, one version is already demanding for free-time developers. this is only a trick to ease transitions and include newer versions also in late release cycles like current one. cheers, domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]