On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > So I am running the relevant autotools at build time but I still get the > > warning. > > If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the > changes which autotools makes are reverted in the clean target. This > means that your diff doesn't get cluttered with automatically generated > things and ensures that repeated builds of the package produce the same > diff.gz.
I haven't seen any other packages doing that - is there an example involving aclocal.m4 somewhere? I really don't want to do all that for the tmpl/* files as well - I don't see the need, copying dozens of files into foo.safe or foo.upstream and then moving them back? > This is the same idea as patch systems reverting the changes they make > in the clean target. Unfortunately, I can't get it to work either. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
