On 12-Jun-08, 11:23 (CDT), "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about using this transition to move some binaries between package > boundaries? Especially having some programs with generic names in -client and > some in -bsd seem to be a problem for some users (like #405827). > > I do not think having lp and lpr in different packages can cause any > good (and the same for lprm and cancel and so on).
Isn't the whole point of having cups-bsd etc. to provide replacement commands that are compatible with older tools? Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
