"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 21 June 2008 11:38:07 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:34:59PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Saturday 21 June 2008 15:52, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> > > I'm still not that sure if its a good idea to add a non-offical >> > > debian repo keyring into the archive... >> > >> > Nobody is forced to install it?! >> > >> > And AFAICS we regulary recommend backports.org to users, who need newer >> > software. So I think it should be in. >> >> But backports.org is still unofficial. If it were permitted, then what >> would happen when other unofficial repository maintainers want to >> package their repository keyrings? Will those be allowed or disallowed? > > Maybe a common, group maintained, debian-unofficial-keyring package?
Err, no. I might want to trust the maintainers of backports.org to handle their keys well, but not necessarily others. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
