This one time, at band camp, Gunnar Wolf said: > Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:21:30PM +0200]: > > > lenny+0.5 would logically be 5.5, since it's unlikely that we will > > > have five stable updates out within 1.5/2=0.75 years, and if we do, > > > then lenny+0.5 is late. > > > > I'm not sure sure that we want to have a hole in our versioning scheme. > > Since "lenny+1/2" is just another stable update, let's just number it > > like a stable update. So we don't end up with users thinking "You > > released 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5. Where is 5.4 ?" > > 1. The RMs are right > > 2. The DDs decided to trust the RMs. > > 3. There is no number 3. > > 4. Our priorities are our users and Free Software.
+1 <insert flame about number 4> :) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature