On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel > > > > > > > You mean this?: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/07/msg00070.html > > > > I think the situation has changed after that.. > > The save/restore and ballooning patches were applied to the trunk 2.6.26 > Debian kernel a few days back, enabling these features for 32 bit > kernels. >
Yep. > > > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps > > > > I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27.. > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=summary > > > > "9 hours ago Ingo Molnar Merge branch 'xen-64bit'" > > Lenny will be releasing with (at most) 2.6.26 and these patches are a > bit too large and intrusive to non-Xen code paths to be backported. > Yeah, I only meant those patches are queued for upstream 2.6.27. I didn't mean they should be applied to debian xen kernel for lenny. Like said, this thread was started to discuss about possible options of getting xen dom0 support into lenny, and I pasted that git link to give a status update of pv_ops work happening atm. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]