On 11454 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> *) I assume that the priority of -dbg packages is extra
>> s/I assume that//
>> s/$/!/
> Does it mean that not being extra is a bug, that the persons with
> write access to the `override' file will systematicly set the priority
> of -dbg packages to `extra', or both?
Both. And they should be extra, unless i missed some when doing it
months ago (or if one of us missed it during NEW processing).
> How can we document all of this better? Would a bug against the Policy
> be appropriate?
Sure.
--
bye, Joerg
<vorlon> since anyone who can get along with elmo must *surely* be part of
the cabal.
<Overfiend> vorlon: Not true. I've gotten along with elmo from time to time.
We're just both ashamed of it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
