On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > OK, thanks. > > > > I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs > > of severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for > > the "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also > > lesser severities too ? > > As far as I can tell, unstable continues as normal. However, nothing > that is uploaded to unstable as of the start of the freeze will be > automatically migrated into testing.
If I understand correctly, uploading a new version to unstable (targeting lenny+1), will prevent you from uploading a minor bug-fix'ed version to unstable. This means that Lenny bug-fix will be uploaded to testing-proposed-update... which won't go through unstable for wide testing. FranklinOn Mon, 2008-07-28 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > OK, thanks. > > I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs of > severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for the > "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also lesser > severities too ? As far as I can tell, unstable continues as normal. However, nothing that is uploaded to unstable as of the start of the freeze will be automatically migrated into testing.
If I understand correctly, uploading a new version to unstable (targeting lenny+1), will prevent you from uploading a minor bug-fix'ed version to unstable. This means that Lenny bug-fix will be uploaded to testing-proposed-update... which won't go through unstable for wide testing.
Franklin