On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > I think it's the purpose of what's coming out of the mancoosi project > (http://www.mancoosi.org/) which follows edos, IIRC.
Indeed, more generally all the aspect of package upgrades are in the scope of Mancoosi, while EDOS was more about the distribution side focusing, among other things, on avoiding broken packages in package repositories. > More details for instance in : http://www.mancoosi.org/deliverables/, > or (in french) in : > http://www.systematic-paris-region.org/fr/UserFiles/File/GT%20LL/EdosToMancoosi.pdf I do have an English version of (a slightly modified version of) that talk, delivered at the University of Lugano a few weeks ago. If people are interested I can make it available, just mail me privately if you are. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature