On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a > compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time > thing, to give time to actually *fix* the problem.
Note that there is currently active upstream work to allow us to address these issues - some of the patches are present in 2.6.27, others are still in flight. This is a vast step forward on where we were with etch if we do decide to go down the route of releasing with exceptions again. > We need the relevant maintainers to be told "your unwillingness to fix > this means we will not be able to release". I don't think that's a particularly constructive approach to take, especially not in a volunteer project. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
