On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:12:25PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Howdy all, > > Have I missed some announcement that DFSG violations don't matter for > the release of ‘lenny’? > > I ask because a whole lot of bug reports of DFSG violations have been > tagged ‘lenny-ignore’ without explanation: > > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/391935> > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/498631> > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494308> > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494010> > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494009> > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494007> > > and probably others I've missed. > > Should these tags be removed? I would think at least a meaningful > justification in the bug report is required if DFSG violations are to > be explicitly ignored, but perhaps I'm wrong. >
As it seems there are a few persons interested by getting those bugs fixed asap, could we create a team of persons willing to deal with users who will get affected by the removal of non-free code? I really don't want to deal with user complaints. The best would be to use a pseudo-package in the BTS for that, so that we can reassign bugs easily. Then I will remove the non-free code with my packages. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]