On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
so then call them 'Debian Foo' team, since this is what they are and no different to the various teams we have already (where some of them are not limited being 100% packaging oriented; e.g. kde team that releases livecds).
Strangely enough people are so keen on all this naming issues that the technical part in the beginning of the announcement did not deserved any comment so far. This fits perfectly into my observation that the thread about renaming on the CDD list attracted more people than any other technical topic before. Your remark above just ignores that the concept tries to profit from synergies inside these projects which for instance are reflected in these tasks or bugs pages, a common technique to build metapackages etc. The interesting thing in all the business I'm doing since several years is that all the technical infrastructure which is used in Debian Med and Debian Edu is instantly available for instance in Debian Science or potential other projects. The main idea behind this stuff is that we are factorising our tools to work for a specific $WORKFIELD$. This makes a difference to technical projects like debian-live - and strangely enough this concept seems to remain a well hidden secret even if I'm constantly talking about this.
everything else is, imho, useless waste of time explaining and defining things in terminology that does not matter for 99% of the people here
The push in the work of the Debian Science team (which formerly just was a simple mailing list) might be a clear sign that finding a common structure based on common technologies is a successful method to push a project.
(ymmv, no offence intended et al. i'm glad and thankful for what you do in and arround debian, but the naming game isn't one of them).
I did not felt offended and I accept that people do not like the naming game. You can believe me that besides the business on the mailing list a lot of other burden was on my shoulders and that I personally was the one who hated this game even more than anybody else here. If you had faced so many missunderstandings about the things you want to promote just *because* the name implies a different concept you are using for your project you would probably have drawn the same consequence. If we now would be able to continue *working* for the concept and stop spending time criticising the name itself (the time for this is over as I tried to explain) or the renaming process in general which is definitely a waste of time I would be really happy. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]