Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > - The only mention women get in the text is thus through a sexual
> > objetification.
> 
> This amounts to concluding that any mention of sexuality is sexual
> objectification of women, which is patently absurd.

No, the claim isn't that broad. The message specifically discusses
women as objects: it promises they will be “delivered directly at
home”, and the entire message discusses women as some kind of reward
being offered to customers.

-- 
 \                             “Holy tintinnabulation, Batman!” —Robin |
  `\                                                                   |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to