[ MFU debian-vote@ ] On Sat, Dec 13, 2008, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > [ ] Choice 1: Reaffirm the Social Contract
I'm fine with reaffirming the social contract. > [ ] Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1] > [ ] Choice 3: Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations [3:1] > [ ] Choice 4: Empower the release team to decide about allowing DFSG > violations [3:1] I want these three too. > [ ] Choice 5: Assume blobs comply with GPL unless proven otherwise I strongly disagree with this. > [ ] Choice 6: Exclude source requirements for firmware (defined) [3:1] I support this proposal; even if I understand it will not bring us very far and we'd have better use of our time than fighting this over. > [ ] Choice 7: Further Discussion This ballot is nonsense: a) I want to decide on requirements of source of firmwares AND allow lenny to release with DFSG violations AND "proprietary" firmware AND empower the release team to release with DFSG violations b) why have a "reaffirm the social contract" option when we have "further discussion"? We all agreed to honor the social contract anyway. Apart of the noise of choice 1, this ballot doesn't empower us to decide on the 4 different questions. So I understand that we intend to honor all choices which beat NOTA, i.e. not only the highest ranked choice. Bye -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org