* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:53:29 +0200]:
> The only constitutional way to get rid of the Secretary without his consent is
> for the DPL to fail to reappoint him, which would automatically mean (since
> I'm
> assuming that the Secretary does not go willingly) that a replacement
> Secretary
> is selected by the Developers by way of General Resolution. I'm not sure when
> the current term of the Secretary expires, but I'd guess it'd be some time
> after the next DPL election.
What does §4.1.7 mean, then? Can't it be read to mean that the DPL may
appoint a new Secretary not at end of term, if there's disagreement
between them?
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Rebekah del Rio - Llorando
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
