Holger Levsen <holger <at> layer-acht.org> writes:
> On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, 
> 
> some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough) 
> consenus...

Sure, but I thought we had an explicit consensus on discrimination against
fields of endeavour, which is seen in CC-By 3.0 4.a about "effective 
technological measures".

Happily, that's only a lawyerbomb (in that no-one, even within CC, seemed 
to agree what it means for debian - is offering source code enough to 
satisfy it?) and not a current live problem.

Beware some of the "ported" CCs which include the trademark notice by
mistake and produced a licence which failed to follow DFSG - and some were 
incompatible with other CC licences.

Hope that helps,
-- 
MJ Ray
My Opinion Only, see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to