Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Michael Biebl wrote: >> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown information field 'Format' in input data in >> general section of control info file >> >> Should I file a bug against dpkg-dev for that? >> >> And another minor issue: vim doesn't know about the new Format field in >> debian/control yet. It seems it [1] has to be updated. > > No, I should rather remove that part of the documentation. The official > way to indicate that we want to use another format is creating > debian/source/format (like I indicated in my mail) and not that > non-supported field.
Ah, ok. I was looking at the referenced bug reports and there you suggested to use the debian/control field (sed -i -e '/^Source:/ aFormat: 3.0 (quilt)' .../debian/control) I think the wiki page you mentioned with up-to-date information regarding this topic would really be a good idea. >> Build-Depends, it would imho be useful if lintian issued a warning, that this >> build-dep is no longer required with 3.0 (quilt). > > Please file a wishlist bug against it, then. :) Only if you think this is a good idea. It was more of a question then a remark. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature