On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:43:37PM +0000, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 22:37:41 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > > - a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first > > line > > of output of a specific command; > > That is also possible in GNU Screen. > > > - a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase. > > That would be a nice bonus. Frankly the GNU Screen codebase > is very messy. (I've worked with it a fair bit.) > > > > The design of tmux seems less secure, too. > > > > In which way is it less secure? > > I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets > in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out > at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else.
Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
