On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:38:50AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I am opposed to bloating the policy with dictum that are > unnecessary, but I see your point about the API. The API is essentially > the watch file, and we already specify that in the policy. DEHS (as > mentioned in policy) uses that file;p there is no need to add stuff > into policy that we already have.
Hrm, but in fact what Policy has to say about watch files can hardly be considered a useful API. It only says that a file named debian/watch may exist, but says nothing about what it's supposed to look like. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
