On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:40:12 +0200, Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org>
wrote:
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 18:51 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've
found
that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in
two
different symbol files. I'd like to ask if (and when) can such situation
actually arise.
My first guess would be nvidia-glx and its diversion of libGL.so.1.
Yes, but even then, libGL.so.1 (the one used for building a package) is
only mentioned in one symbol file, namely the one from nvidia-glx, isn't
it (let's put aside the package doesn't feature a symbol file)? Why should
the libgl1-mesa-glx symbol file, if it existed, be taken into account?
Regards
Jiri Palecek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
