Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> With the include approach, we lack this feature and bad/broken local
>> overrides can't be detected if we only have the build log at hand.
>
> which reminds me that we dont have build logs for probably a lot more than
> 25%
> (*) of the most used packages in the archive. The ones build manually by the
> developer...
>
> I would really like to see that binaries for all archs are (re-)build on
> builds and that those logs are kept archived and linked from the PTS. (And
> arch all too of course).
>
>
> regards,
> Holger
>
> (*) wild guess, asuming that most packages are upload on amd64/i386/powerpc
> and mostly used on i386.
Debuild already creates a build log. I think it would be nice to
include that file in the changes file and have DAK forward it to
buildd.debian.org for archival. git-buildpackage, svn-buildpackage,
... or even dpkg-buildpackage could do this too.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
