On 2009-06-16, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Charles Plessy<ple...@debian.org> wrote: > >> The dh_make template for debian/copyright induces many developers to put >> their >> packaging work under the GPL, and I have already seen packages whose license >> is >> otherwise BSD-ish with such patches. If the maintainer suddenly goes MIA and >> the patch is non-trivial, then in theory if we want to respect what is >> written, >> we are stuck with a GPL'ed patch. Therefore, we have an optional License >> field >> to make things crystal clear if necessary. > > Sounds like dh_make needs a bug report about the default packagaging > license, could you file one?
There is several, and it just got changed to gplv3. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
