On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:48:22AM -0400, David Bremner wrote: [..snip..] > At least with topgit, patch branches are meant to be pushed and > pulled, and use merge rather than rebase for just this reason. This > makes the history ugly, but does facilitate the kind of collaboration > James alluded to. I lost track of what the global point of this Sure. I think I do understand what James is talking about. It's basically a matter of taste if you rebase patch branches or use topgit - both have their up and downsides. Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
